When it comes to large, long-term projects, the risks of resorting to cross-platform app development technologies can outweigh the potential time-saving advantages. Furthermore, React Native, the most preferred cross-platform app development framework, was under a controversial license. It made things difficult for app development agencies to recommend using it. That’s why they suggest delegating projects involving multiple apps to dual native developers.
Do you hope to reduce your expenses in your iOS/Android app development project? Then you should consider hiring top android app developers with equal expertise in iOS app development. Agencies like these have dual native app developers, and this topic will attempt to help you understand the perks of letting such a developer oversee your project. Or you can always be on the safer side and try Osulogin.
According to a representative of a reputable mobile app development firm, the company received a project that required developers to build four native applications. Two of those apps were to be for two different user bases with native iOS and Android versions for each.
As it was a large, long-term project, the specialists gauged their options before initiating the project. They found that the risks of using cross-platform technology tended to outweigh the time-saving advantages. Furthermore, the world-renowned cross-platform framework called React Native was under a controversial license back then. It further made things difficult for developers to recommend undertaking such a project.
In an attempt to fill the gap of efforts, the developers had to be as efficient as possible. It wasn’t a worthwhile idea to create the clone of two separate apps on another platform, at least when considered from the perspective of the budget. The developers knew they could do something better.
Today, if you feel the need to hire an iPhone app developer, you should look for specialists that can take on massive projects. However, the team handling such a project has to be nimbler than usual. The benefit of working with such an app development team will pass on to its clients, allowing them to penetrate the playing field more effectively while competing against the largest names in the business.
Table of Contents
The advantage of efficiency
Once you hire an iPhone app developer, the team will start the project by implementing the application on iOS. There, they will perform the entire bulk of iteration and feedback. Ignoring this process at this phase will require the development team to implement the same thing twice for both Android and iOS separately, which will lead to a waste of time and money as the app evolves rapidly.
It’s also worth mentioning here that having two different iOS and Android development teams won’t be efficient. After all, they will be doubling up the work and create more problems that will need solving.
That’s why you need to keep your eyes open for app development agencies with developers that can build Android and iOS apps without compromising on quality or standard. The presence of a developer with an in-depth understanding of an application on one platform is priceless in being able to implement the same again on another platform rapidly.
In a bid to capitalize on the efficiency benefit of having the same developer handle both platforms back-to-back, the team will keep the architectures of the apps as aligned as possible to make implementing the second app easier.
The perks
If the timeline of your project allows it, back-to-back development will be more effective almost every time and in every situation. The top android app developers say that the lessons learned and the problems solved during the first implementation of an app can increase the development speed of the second drastically.
The best developers can put a feature freeze in place as soon as they sign off the iOS application. It means they won’t try to shoot at a moving target. They will port it effectively from iOS to Android.
One more advantage of developing mobile applications back-to-back using the iOS app as the reference point is that the developers will find bugs with ease while porting the code. As a result, they’ll make both apps more robust than usual.
On the other hand, developers will choose to utilize the concurrent development strategy if they have to meet time-to-market deadlines. However, it will be a costlier venture for both initial development and future development. After all, they’ll have to dedicate more working hours to develop both applications. They’ll have to take care of the design-related differences from scratch.
No code sharing
The top android app developers with expertise in iOS app development may avoid the path of “code sharing” between Android and iOS. When initiating the project, most developers will choose Swift for iOS and Kotlin for Android because both languages are mature enough. Besides, many similarities exist between these two programming languages, unlike Objective C and Java.
Ideally, code sharing is better than porting common components to another programming language. Then again, as already mentioned earlier, there are risks of using a cross-platform app development framework for such projects.
There are some experimental methods of using both Kotlin and Swift on iOS, but they aren’t ready for production. While these did progress over time, to the best developers, they aren’t suitable for long-term projects.
Furthermore, even a few years ago, not many developers used to attempt to implement the Coordinator pattern on Android. Many development agencies had to put up with this issue. The process of implementing the pattern on Android is quite different from iOS, particularly due to the difference in lifecycles and memory management.
Final words
The primary reason why development agencies take this path is that they want to be as efficient as possible regarding the time and money spent on developing the applications. The approach described above allows the best development teams to tackle massive projects with small yet nimble teams. As long as the developers are efficient, clients will gain more on a limited budget. Everyone knows how invaluable it is to be able to stand up to bigger players in the market. These players have much deeper pockets, and to be competitive, such approaches are mandatory. They can make large-scale projects much more feasible.