Entrepreneurs Break
No Result
View All Result
Thursday, June 30, 2022
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • Health
  • Opinion
Entrepreneurs Break
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • Health
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Entrepreneurs Break
No Result
View All Result
Home Lifestyle

Childcare & Rights of Access In The Case Of Separated Parents

by Ethan
February 19, 2022
in Lifestyle
0
Childcare & Rights of Access
156
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Table of Contents

  • Strengthens change model
  • The case of the Federal Board of Justice: one week with the father, one week with the mother
  • Visitation rights: exchange model yes, but…
  • The Federal Constitutional Court decides on a rejected change model
  • Compensation of Gains: Honesty Is a Must
  • Compensation of gains: what is it?
  • On the equalization of gains case of the OLG Hamm
  • Conclusion on gain compensation

Strengthens change model

After an uncontested divorce Las Vegas or separation, custody often remains with both parents. Nevertheless, it is the rule that care is provided according to the so-called residence model. This means the child lives with one parent and visits the other parent regularly. In its decision of February 1, 2017, the Federal Court of Justice made it clear that the so-called change model can also be enforced – even if one parent rejects it. With the change model, the child lives with both parents to a comparable extent despite separation or divorce. In other words: the place of residence is changed regularly.

The case of the Federal Board of Justice: one week with the father, one week with the mother

On the case decided by the Federal Court of Justice, decision of February 1st, 2017 – XII ZB 601/15. The father of a son wanted to see the child more often than at the agreed visiting times and pursued this goal in court. The BGH has now decided in the last instance that the switch model is a good option in this case. The change model is not excluded by the law and even a rejection of this model by a parent does not fundamentally prevent this regulation. The decisive criterion is the best interests of the child, which must be determined on a case-by-case basis.

The case of the Federal Board of Justice

However, an equal change model for visitation rights requires “the parents to be able to communicate and cooperate”. Therefore, a change model should not serve as a vehicle to create the parents’ ability to cooperate.

Therefore, the family court is obliged to clarify comprehensively “which form of contact best corresponds to the best interests of the child”. With this declaration, the matter was referred back to the responsible Higher Regional Court for further treatment and decision.

Visitation rights: exchange model yes, but…

The BGH points out that such a changeover model places significantly higher demands on the organization of all those involved. If the ex-partners are very much at odds, such a model will hardly be in the child’s interest. In addition, a change model for kindergarten or school children is only practicable if the parents live in the same city. In addition to parents and school, the circle of friends is also one of the most important environmental conditions for the well-being of a child.

According to this decision, the decisive factor is how the child would like to live. With increasing age, his wishes and ideas became more and more important. The court must therefore always hear the child personally.

The Federal Constitutional Court decides on a rejected change model

It’s not easy, because in the end the parents have to be able to clarify all the details with each other on a regular basis. And the constitutional complaint of another father, which is to be heard before the Federal Constitutional Court in 2017, shows that the issue of changing models for childcare is not finally off the table even with this judgment. He was previously denied the exchange model by a court.

Compensation of Gains: Honesty Is a Must

Divorce: Calculation of equalization of accrued gains only with comprehensive information

If married couples get divorced, the equalization of accrued gains for the marriage period is usually to be calculated. Since most marriages in the US are concluded with the statutory matrimonial property regime of the community of accrued gains. In order to calculate a fair distribution of assets in the end, it is naturally crucial that all relevant data and figures are disclosed. The Hamm Higher Regional Court states that the spouses have a corresponding obligation to provide information.

Compensation of Gains

Each of the spouses can apply for the equalization of gains in the event of a divorce if the marriage was concluded according to the statutory matrimonial property regime – i.e. without a marriage contract. This regulates § 1363 Abs. 1 BGB. However, the compensation is only regulated by a court upon application. Since there may be high amounts in dispute (and thus legal and court costs), it is advisable to reach an amicable agreement before the divorce if possible.

Compensation of gains: what is it?

As a rule, the wealth of the spouses increases during the marriage period. It is irrelevant whether it is about bank balances, real estate, securities, your own company or insurance. Even reduced debt counts. In general, the gain for each spouse is defined as the difference between their final wealth at the time of the divorce and their initial wealth at the time of marriage. Now the law provides for the marital property regime of the community of gains stipulates that each spouse should share in half of the partner’s increase in assets. Since not all assets can be divided, the claim for equalization of gains is always based on a monetary payment. The two conflicting claims are offset in the process. The total assets must always be included in the calculation.

On the equalization of gains case of the OLG Hamm

In the present case, a couple had built a house on a plot of land. The husband was the owner of the associated property through a heritable building right. When the two spouses divorced after 13 years, both assumed in the accrued gains equalization procedure that the house – or its current value – would be taken into account equally for both of them. Based on the remaining wealth difference, an agreement was reached and the husband paid the wife $15,000 in compensation.

Only after the process was completed did the woman find out that the man was always the sole owner of the heritable building right – and thus of the house. The husband became aware of this during the ongoing divorce proceedings, but did not communicate this. On the basis of this change in ownership, the woman wanted the accrual equalization procedure to be continued with an increased equalization payment. The family court denied this. The Higher Regional Court of Hamm was subsequently asked to appeal.

Conclusion on gain compensation

The OLG Hamm (Az: 3 UF 47/15) found in its decision that the husband was obliged to disclose this new knowledge about the actual ownership structure without being asked, because he was aware that by concealing his ex-wife financially disadvantaged.

Such problems can be avoided by those who conclude a marriage contract at the time of marriage or choose the separation of property as their property regime.

Tags: Childcare & Rights of Access
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Potential High Return Cryptocurrencies in 2021

Potential High Return Cryptocurrencies in 2021

October 25, 2021
5 Tips to Becoming a Good Actor- The Best Guide by Julian Brand

5 Tips to Becoming a Good Actor- The Best Guide by Julian Brand

January 9, 2022
How to Search, Share and Download Video TikTok

How to Search, Share and Download Video TikTok

April 25, 2022
New Roof

How Long Will It Take To Install My New Roof

August 7, 2021
Top 5 Safety Tips for your Family Road Trip

Top 5 Safety Tips for your Family Road Trip

2
Discover How to Get More Facebook Fans in 3 Weeks

Discover How to Get More Facebook Fans in 3 Weeks

1
Blockchain for Social Good

Blockchain for Social Good: Transparency and Accountability is Key

1
What is TikTok? Lets find out more about the app of the moment

What is TikTok? Lets find out more about the app of the moment

0
Mike Bjorkman On How to Make the Most Out of Your Charitable Giving This Year

Mike Bjorkman On How to Make the Most Out of Your Charitable Giving This Year

June 30, 2022
How To Find The Best Gold IRA Companies Online

How To Find The Best Gold IRA Companies Online

June 30, 2022
Guidelines For Jobseekers In Using Job Portals And Which Portals To Go To

Guidelines For Jobseekers In Using Job Portals And Which Portals To Go To

June 30, 2022
bitcoin

Easy 3-Step Guide to Buying Your First Bitcoin

June 30, 2022
Entrepreneurs Break

Entrepreneurs Break is mostly focus on Business, Entertainment, Lifestyle, Health, News, and many more articles.

Contact: [email protected]

Note: We are not related or affiliated with entrepreneur.com or any Entrepreneur media.

© 2022 - Entrepreneurs Break

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • Health
  • Opinion

© 2022 - Entrepreneurs Break

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In